Theme three - how we keep people safe

In this section

Our ambition is…

The strategic plan for the GSAB identifies a series of priorities to improve:

 

  • awareness and understanding of Adult Safeguarding among professionals and the public;
  • prevention and responding to reports of abuse and neglect;
  • learning and continuous improvement.

Additionally, our ambition is to:

 

  • Achieve greater leadership across the system in the area of severe and multiple disadvantage,
  • To improve how we work with children’s services in preparing for adulthood
  • Further develop our work with people with complex needs, alongside Public Health and District councils

Our strengths

  • Our Disabilities Quality Assurance team and peer review model with Inclusion Gloucestershire (local User led organisation) oversees quality of providers.
  • Robust emergency planning and business continuity – we have extensive emergency plans, out of hours support, major incident response strategies and business continuity arrangements which is demonstrated in how we respond effectively to unexpected events such as critical incidents (pandemic, floods, provider failure etc).  Our responses to events show we can effectively maintain service delivery despite challenging circumstances.
  • We have sound strategic risk management practices.  This was highlighted as a strength by the Adult Social Care LGA Peer Challenge (Sept 2023).

Priorities for improvement

  •  We are building our approach to quality assurance across the whole of the market.
  • Patterns of low-level concerns are currently identified manually within the safeguarding SPA leading to duplication and inefficiency.
  • There are a high number of into county placements into care providers in Gloucestershire, and our visibility of these people and their support is limited.
  • Ideally planning for transitioning to adulthood should start from year 9, but we recognise that there is further work to do with Children's Social Care, Health, and Education to help prepare young people and their families that services in adulthood will look very different and the focus will be on wellbeing and independence.

Key statistics

Activity

Working Well

Improvement

Just over three-quarters of people receiving support or care felt safe (77.0%, up from 75.9% in 2021/22).

The vast majority attributing their feelings of safety to the services they receive from us (92.5%). This places Gloucestershire as the second-best performer in the peer group. Performance has been consistently in the top quartile for over 5 years.

We do not benchmark well with comparator peer group for adults with learning disabilities who live in their own homes or with family 66.8% compared with 75.2%.  Whilst our performance in this area has improved from the previous year there remains concerns around data quality and whether our outturn reflects actual performance in this area as current data returns exclude people living in supported living accommodation.

28 Care Homes rated as Requires Improvement by CQC (3 without a rating). 17 Community Providers RI (35 community providers without a rating). 0 providers rated as inadequate. 

Gloucestershire benchmarks well in most CQC domains for bed-based care (84.2% good or outstanding compared with 78% mean for SW and 77.4% for England).

We know we have a strong Care market for people with disabilities with an over provision especially in Supported Living Providers, this results in a safeguarding risk as placements are taken up from out of area placements usually with little foreknowledge and usually by individuals who have complex needs which puts pressure on our local NHS services.  Whilst we don’t know exact numbers of out of area placements into Gloucestershire, we believe this to be over 800 people.

We work with people and our partners to establish and maintain safe systems of care, in which safety is managed, monitored and assured. We ensure continuity of care, including when people move between different services.  This can be demonstrated through some of the initiatives as described in Appendix 7.


Mental Capacity Act (MCA)

Our approach to applying the Mental Capacity Act[i] to safeguarding is supported by a dedicated MCA Manager who also provides training on the MCA. If a person has no-one to support them and lacks capacity to consent to the enquiry or otherwise has a substantial difficulty participating, then an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) can be appointed and this is through an application to the Gloucestershire Advocacy POhWER Service.  There is a suite of MCA resources and leaflets including easy read resources available.


Out of county placements

We minimise placing people out of county by making sure we have opportunities within Gloucestershire. We have relatively low numbers of people who are placed out of county (IR 17.1). There is an annual face to face review process for these individuals, and anyone eligible for DoLS is prioritised.


Provider closure

We have a Regulated Provider Closure Policy[ii] which provides staff with a clear protocol to follow when a care provider is unable to meet care and support needs due to temporary interruption or permanent business failure.  The LGA Peer Challenge also quoted that

“GCC has established and tested protocols to effectively respond to provider failure, providing an organised and planned response in cases when service providers cannot deliver as contracted, safeguarding those with a lived experience wellbeing in the process”.


Business continuity

Our Business Continuity process[iii] is part of the Local Resilience Forum (LRF) and we have emergency response plans to respond to various emergencies and work closely with the wider Council and District Councils to ensure Adult Social Care response in an emergency, these are tested in exercises[1] (Adult Social Care has 97% attendance in these exercises) as well as experience of using them for different emergencies over the years e.g. flooding.  We have in total 30 plans (reviewed 6 monthly, as of March 2024 87% up to date) and impact assessments (reviewed annually, 100% up to date). The Corporate Leadership Team (CLT) has approved a policy (IR 25) programme of work on BCM which aims to thoroughly review, update and embed BCM across all Directorates. Regular updates are provided to the council’s Business Continuity Management Assurance Board (BCMAB) and CLT.


Our strengths

  • Our Disabilities Quality Assurance team and peer review model with Inclusion Gloucestershire (local User led organisation) oversees quality of providers.
  • Robust emergency planning and business continuity – we have extensive emergency plans, out of hours support, major incident response strategies and business continuity arrangements which is demonstrated in how we respond effectively to unexpected events such as critical incidents (pandemic, floods, provider failure etc).  Our responses to events show we can effectively maintain service delivery despite challenging circumstances.
  • We have sound strategic risk management practices.  This was highlighted as a strength by the Adult Social Care LGA Peer Challenge (Sept 2023).

Priorities for improvement

  •  We are building our approach to quality assurance across the whole of the market.
  • Patterns of low-level concerns are currently identified manually within the safeguarding SPA leading to duplication and inefficiency.
  • There are a high number of into county placements into care providers in Gloucestershire, and our visibility of these people and their support is limited.
  • Ideally planning for transitioning to adulthood should start from year 9, but we recognise that there is further work to do with Children's Social Care, Health, and Education to help prepare young people and their families that services in adulthood will look very different and the focus will be on wellbeing and independence.

Key statistics

Activity

Working Well

Improvement

Just over three-quarters of people receiving support or care felt safe (77.0%, up from 75.9% in 2021/22).

The vast majority attributing their feelings of safety to the services they receive from us (92.5%). This places Gloucestershire as the second-best performer in the peer group. Performance has been consistently in the top quartile for over 5 years.

We do not benchmark well with comparator peer group for adults with learning disabilities who live in their own homes or with family 66.8% compared with 75.2%.  Whilst our performance in this area has improved from the previous year there remains concerns around data quality and whether our outturn reflects actual performance in this area as current data returns exclude people living in supported living accommodation.

28 Care Homes rated as Requires Improvement by CQC (3 without a rating). 17 Community Providers RI (35 community providers without a rating). 0 providers rated as inadequate. 

Gloucestershire benchmarks well in most CQC domains for bed-based care (84.2% good or outstanding compared with 78% mean for SW and 77.4% for England).

We know we have a strong Care market for people with disabilities with an over provision especially in Supported Living Providers, this results in a safeguarding risk as placements are taken up from out of area placements usually with little foreknowledge and usually by individuals who have complex needs which puts pressure on our local NHS services.  Whilst we don’t know exact numbers of out of area placements into Gloucestershire, we believe this to be over 800 people.

We work with people and our partners to establish and maintain safe systems of care, in which safety is managed, monitored and assured. We ensure continuity of care, including when people move between different services.  This can be demonstrated through some of the initiatives as described in Appendix 7.


Mental Capacity Act (MCA)

Our approach to applying the Mental Capacity Act[i] to safeguarding is supported by a dedicated MCA Manager who also provides training on the MCA. If a person has no-one to support them and lacks capacity to consent to the enquiry or otherwise has a substantial difficulty participating, then an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) can be appointed and this is through an application to the Gloucestershire Advocacy POhWER Service.  There is a suite of MCA resources and leaflets including easy read resources available.


Out of county placements

We minimise placing people out of county by making sure we have opportunities within Gloucestershire. We have relatively low numbers of people who are placed out of county (IR 17.1). There is an annual face to face review process for these individuals, and anyone eligible for DoLS is prioritised.


Provider closure

We have a Regulated Provider Closure Policy[ii] which provides staff with a clear protocol to follow when a care provider is unable to meet care and support needs due to temporary interruption or permanent business failure.  The LGA Peer Challenge also quoted that

“GCC has established and tested protocols to effectively respond to provider failure, providing an organised and planned response in cases when service providers cannot deliver as contracted, safeguarding those with a lived experience wellbeing in the process”.


Business continuity

Our Business Continuity process[iii] is part of the Local Resilience Forum (LRF) and we have emergency response plans to respond to various emergencies and work closely with the wider Council and District Councils to ensure Adult Social Care response in an emergency, these are tested in exercises[1] (Adult Social Care has 97% attendance in these exercises) as well as experience of using them for different emergencies over the years e.g. flooding.  We have in total 30 plans (reviewed 6 monthly, as of March 2024 87% up to date) and impact assessments (reviewed annually, 100% up to date). The Corporate Leadership Team (CLT) has approved a policy (IR 25) programme of work on BCM which aims to thoroughly review, update and embed BCM across all Directorates. Regular updates are provided to the council’s Business Continuity Management Assurance Board (BCMAB) and CLT.


Our strengths

  • Our centralised safeguarding team ensures consistent decision making, risk assessment and coordination of complex enquiries and organisational abuse. They are a dedicated and experienced workforce from a range of professional backgrounds, for example, social work, police, sexual violence, mental health, health and this gives the team the depth of knowledge and experience to be able to triage cases quickly.
  • We have a mature and well supported Adults Safeguarding Board with stable membership.  Support from partners contributes to building strong partnerships across the safeguarding landscape that share information, resources and expertise e.g. The Independent Chair of GSAB is a member of Safer Gloucestershire[i], which joins together a number of the Community Safety Partnerships. The profile of adult safeguarding in this forum helps explore our safeguarding role in the wider community.
  • Our Single Point of Access Team ensures feedback on safeguarding referrals is provided to professionals in a timely manner.
  • Our Safeguarding portal for professionals provides an easier electronic route for professionals to report 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
  • We have good relationships with our system partners and agencies to share intelligence and concerns to keep people safe e.g. our Fire Safety Development Subgroup of our Safeguarding Adults Board.

Priorities for improvement

  • Establish a means of oversight across the whole safeguarding response pathway, including consideration of resources and use of data and technology.
  • Timeliness in decision making regarding whether the section 42 criteria are met by the central safeguarding team is a known issue and has been verified in recent audits. This is due to increase in established safeguarding concerns as a result of the implementation of the Safeguarding SPA and the growing complexity of cases referred to safeguarding.
  • Ensuring the voices of people from all communities across Gloucestershire are heard and responded to, and improving how we work with people with complex needs is outlined in our three-year strategic plan for GSAB.
  • Develop a response to the challenges in the safeguarding response when individuals have Mental Health or Continuing Health Care needs, to achieve effective risk management.
  • Develop our approach to working with people with lived experience of safeguarding processes to help us to improve person centredness in our safeguarding work.

Key statistics

Activity

Working Well

Improvement

The number of concerns received in the in the year to end Feb 2023-2024 was 2663 which is 491 more than in 2022. A person’s own home is the most likely place for abuse to take place and was recorded 62% of the time in the year to 31st December 2023.

84.7% staff that should complete their level 3 safeguarding training have (target 80%).

The current number of outstanding DoLS applications is 1765.  This equates to an average 288 per month. Of which 7 are from 2015-2016. We have plans in place to monitor and risk manage the list of outstanding applications so that we are assured that the people who will benefit most from the protections offered by DoLS are able to access them in as timely a manner as possible.

The number of concerns raised has increased since the start of the Single Point of Access for the Safeguarding Service at the beginning of August 2023. From August to December 2023, 1184 concerns were received; this represents an increase of 41% on the same period in 2022 when 842 concerns were received.  This increased again October 2023 – March 2024 to 2791.  This equates to 461 per month on average.[1]

The average number of days to complete a S42 Enquiry over the last calendar year was 86 days. This is roughly 17.2 weeks or around 4 months. 

The percentage of S42 Enquiries open has been falling from 20% earlier in the year to closer to 12% (target 20%)

The proportion of S42 Enquiries completed where the risk is removed or reduced was 66%

The conversion rate from Concern to Section 42 Enquiry has been  24% for the last 4 quarters. January, June and October of 2023 were well above this level at 29%, 33%, 30% and 26% respectively

The conversion rate for the Southwest was 28% in 22/23 and England was 33% which is higher than both the Southwest and Gloucestershire.

 

[1] Timeliness of decision making by the safeguarding adults team is an issue. A new role is being introduced to the team (Safeguarding Adults Support Officer) to assist with reducing the time safeguarding concerns remain with the team awaiting a decision.

We work with people to understand what being safe means to them and work with our partners to develop the best way to achieve this concentrating on improving people’s lives while protecting their right to live in safety, free from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm, and neglect, we make sure we share concerns quickly and appropriately. Further examples of how we can demonstrate compliance against this quality statement are available in appendix 8.


The Safeguarding Team

The Safeguarding team is responsible for information gathering and decision making on whether a concern meets the criteria for a Section 42 enquiry, they also co-ordinate all organisational abuse concerns, provide advice and support to professionals, chair complex safeguarding meetings and maintain oversight of enquiries which are caused to be made by other agencies. There are robust links between the safeguarding team, commissioning, and quality teams and the CQC. The team has adopted the LGA/ADASS “making decisions” document as a framework for their decision-making. The specialist safeguarding team are available to provide expert advice and guidance as well monitoring and providing quality assurance of all enquiries “caused” to other agencies. Where a Section 42 Enquiry is indicated the safeguarding team pass to the relevant Adult Social Care operational locality teams (including the Hospital Social work Team) who will allocate a social worker to undertake the enquiry. The enquiry is supported, supervised and quality assured and signed off by a Social Work Manager.


Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board

The Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board (GSAB) meets quarterly and manages its work through a range of subgroups with involvement from a range of partners across Gloucestershire including Health, Police, District Councils, and Voluntary Sector. Key safeguarding risks and issues are identified through contributions from partners and through GSAB annual self-assessment audits and go through a peer challenge process with partners. The GSAB meetings offer an opportunity for members to seek assurance and challenge, with meetings being organised on themes and learning shared for professionals on the GSAB website.


Statement from independent chair of Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board

“Gloucestershire has had a safeguarding adults board in place since 2009, which reflects the strong ongoing commitment to safeguarding adults within the county. Much has been done over the years to strengthen and raise awareness of what constitutes abuse and neglect, and how to respond to it. Since its inception the board has aspired and striven to protect and safeguard some of the most vulnerable members of our community through our strategic plans and the various sub groups, that sit under the Board.

We have taken every opportunity to learn through the learning events and safeguarding adult reviews that we have undertaken locally and accessed through the National network. The assurance process is a real opportunity to raise further awareness of adult safeguarding and to identify areas where we can make sustainable and continuous improvement. This includes hearing the voices of those individuals who come into contact with professionals and the voluntary and community sector through safeguarding activity and the way we ensure that we can evidence the positive impact we are making through our data and quality assurance processes.”


Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs)

Safeguarding Adults Reviews[i] are publicised across the partnership and published on our website in full (unless by exception it should not be published). As part of the SAR where possible the views of the person, their families and carers are collated and helps to shape the findings and recommendations.


Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)

We have a dedicated, highly skilled team who manage DoLS applications.  We have robust mechanisms in place to check the quality of DoLS work in terms of appropriate prioritisation (by experience assessor leads) and assessments undertaken. The team has improved its arrangements for monitoring the waiting list with the introduction of DoLS Co-ordinator posts with the aim of ensuring that the people most in need of the protections offered by the DoLS are prioritised for assessment and authorisation.


Fire Safety Development Subgroup of GSAB

The Fire Safety Development subgroup of GSAB was set up in in 2014 response to an unusually high number of fire fatalities in the preceding year. This is a multi-agency group which focuses on minimising risks and learning from near mises/ fire fatalities by producing and implementing fire safety action plans.


Hoarding Forum

This includes people with lived experience of hoarding to identify ways of working more effectively with people who are at risk due to hoarding. In another initiative, in response to fuel poverty and the cost-of-living crisis the group has arranged provision of free slow cookers/heated fire-retardant blankets to people living with these issues. Working as a system we will be holding a Gloucestershire Hoarding Awareness Day in April with the Fire service, housing association, Hoarding UK, Environmental Health etc to share presentations, answer questions and talk about our multi-agency approach.


PREVENT

We recognise the importance of Adult Social Care contributing to work taken to safeguard vulnerable people at risk of radicalisation. Our teams support the multi-agency PREVENT agenda in Gloucestershire.


Self-neglect

We have a focus on self-neglect as part of our strategic plan and have held a number of professional development opportunities for staff.  We have a best practice guidance to support staff.  We are planning to introduce a Multi-Agency Risk Management (MARM) framework this year, as we have identified that there is a growing number of individuals who do not meet the criteria for a Section 42 Enquiry, however, are at high risk of serious harm.  This will be co-ordinated by a dedicated post within the Safeguarding Adults team.


[i] Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board, Published Safeguarding Adults Reviews, https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/gsab/safeguarding-adults-board/safeguarding-adults-reviews/

Our strengths

  • Our centralised safeguarding team ensures consistent decision making, risk assessment and coordination of complex enquiries and organisational abuse. They are a dedicated and experienced workforce from a range of professional backgrounds, for example, social work, police, sexual violence, mental health, health and this gives the team the depth of knowledge and experience to be able to triage cases quickly.
  • We have a mature and well supported Adults Safeguarding Board with stable membership.  Support from partners contributes to building strong partnerships across the safeguarding landscape that share information, resources and expertise e.g. The Independent Chair of GSAB is a member of Safer Gloucestershire[i], which joins together a number of the Community Safety Partnerships. The profile of adult safeguarding in this forum helps explore our safeguarding role in the wider community.
  • Our Single Point of Access Team ensures feedback on safeguarding referrals is provided to professionals in a timely manner.
  • Our Safeguarding portal for professionals provides an easier electronic route for professionals to report 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.
  • We have good relationships with our system partners and agencies to share intelligence and concerns to keep people safe e.g. our Fire Safety Development Subgroup of our Safeguarding Adults Board.

Priorities for improvement

  • Establish a means of oversight across the whole safeguarding response pathway, including consideration of resources and use of data and technology.
  • Timeliness in decision making regarding whether the section 42 criteria are met by the central safeguarding team is a known issue and has been verified in recent audits. This is due to increase in established safeguarding concerns as a result of the implementation of the Safeguarding SPA and the growing complexity of cases referred to safeguarding.
  • Ensuring the voices of people from all communities across Gloucestershire are heard and responded to, and improving how we work with people with complex needs is outlined in our three-year strategic plan for GSAB.
  • Develop a response to the challenges in the safeguarding response when individuals have Mental Health or Continuing Health Care needs, to achieve effective risk management.
  • Develop our approach to working with people with lived experience of safeguarding processes to help us to improve person centredness in our safeguarding work.

Key statistics

Activity

Working Well

Improvement

The number of concerns received in the in the year to end Feb 2023-2024 was 2663 which is 491 more than in 2022. A person’s own home is the most likely place for abuse to take place and was recorded 62% of the time in the year to 31st December 2023.

84.7% staff that should complete their level 3 safeguarding training have (target 80%).

The current number of outstanding DoLS applications is 1765.  This equates to an average 288 per month. Of which 7 are from 2015-2016. We have plans in place to monitor and risk manage the list of outstanding applications so that we are assured that the people who will benefit most from the protections offered by DoLS are able to access them in as timely a manner as possible.

The number of concerns raised has increased since the start of the Single Point of Access for the Safeguarding Service at the beginning of August 2023. From August to December 2023, 1184 concerns were received; this represents an increase of 41% on the same period in 2022 when 842 concerns were received.  This increased again October 2023 – March 2024 to 2791.  This equates to 461 per month on average.[1]

The average number of days to complete a S42 Enquiry over the last calendar year was 86 days. This is roughly 17.2 weeks or around 4 months. 

The percentage of S42 Enquiries open has been falling from 20% earlier in the year to closer to 12% (target 20%)

The proportion of S42 Enquiries completed where the risk is removed or reduced was 66%

The conversion rate from Concern to Section 42 Enquiry has been  24% for the last 4 quarters. January, June and October of 2023 were well above this level at 29%, 33%, 30% and 26% respectively

The conversion rate for the Southwest was 28% in 22/23 and England was 33% which is higher than both the Southwest and Gloucestershire.

 

[1] Timeliness of decision making by the safeguarding adults team is an issue. A new role is being introduced to the team (Safeguarding Adults Support Officer) to assist with reducing the time safeguarding concerns remain with the team awaiting a decision.

We work with people to understand what being safe means to them and work with our partners to develop the best way to achieve this concentrating on improving people’s lives while protecting their right to live in safety, free from bullying, harassment, abuse, discrimination, avoidable harm, and neglect, we make sure we share concerns quickly and appropriately. Further examples of how we can demonstrate compliance against this quality statement are available in appendix 8.


The Safeguarding Team

The Safeguarding team is responsible for information gathering and decision making on whether a concern meets the criteria for a Section 42 enquiry, they also co-ordinate all organisational abuse concerns, provide advice and support to professionals, chair complex safeguarding meetings and maintain oversight of enquiries which are caused to be made by other agencies. There are robust links between the safeguarding team, commissioning, and quality teams and the CQC. The team has adopted the LGA/ADASS “making decisions” document as a framework for their decision-making. The specialist safeguarding team are available to provide expert advice and guidance as well monitoring and providing quality assurance of all enquiries “caused” to other agencies. Where a Section 42 Enquiry is indicated the safeguarding team pass to the relevant Adult Social Care operational locality teams (including the Hospital Social work Team) who will allocate a social worker to undertake the enquiry. The enquiry is supported, supervised and quality assured and signed off by a Social Work Manager.


Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board

The Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board (GSAB) meets quarterly and manages its work through a range of subgroups with involvement from a range of partners across Gloucestershire including Health, Police, District Councils, and Voluntary Sector. Key safeguarding risks and issues are identified through contributions from partners and through GSAB annual self-assessment audits and go through a peer challenge process with partners. The GSAB meetings offer an opportunity for members to seek assurance and challenge, with meetings being organised on themes and learning shared for professionals on the GSAB website.


Statement from independent chair of Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board

“Gloucestershire has had a safeguarding adults board in place since 2009, which reflects the strong ongoing commitment to safeguarding adults within the county. Much has been done over the years to strengthen and raise awareness of what constitutes abuse and neglect, and how to respond to it. Since its inception the board has aspired and striven to protect and safeguard some of the most vulnerable members of our community through our strategic plans and the various sub groups, that sit under the Board.

We have taken every opportunity to learn through the learning events and safeguarding adult reviews that we have undertaken locally and accessed through the National network. The assurance process is a real opportunity to raise further awareness of adult safeguarding and to identify areas where we can make sustainable and continuous improvement. This includes hearing the voices of those individuals who come into contact with professionals and the voluntary and community sector through safeguarding activity and the way we ensure that we can evidence the positive impact we are making through our data and quality assurance processes.”


Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs)

Safeguarding Adults Reviews[i] are publicised across the partnership and published on our website in full (unless by exception it should not be published). As part of the SAR where possible the views of the person, their families and carers are collated and helps to shape the findings and recommendations.


Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)

We have a dedicated, highly skilled team who manage DoLS applications.  We have robust mechanisms in place to check the quality of DoLS work in terms of appropriate prioritisation (by experience assessor leads) and assessments undertaken. The team has improved its arrangements for monitoring the waiting list with the introduction of DoLS Co-ordinator posts with the aim of ensuring that the people most in need of the protections offered by the DoLS are prioritised for assessment and authorisation.


Fire Safety Development Subgroup of GSAB

The Fire Safety Development subgroup of GSAB was set up in in 2014 response to an unusually high number of fire fatalities in the preceding year. This is a multi-agency group which focuses on minimising risks and learning from near mises/ fire fatalities by producing and implementing fire safety action plans.


Hoarding Forum

This includes people with lived experience of hoarding to identify ways of working more effectively with people who are at risk due to hoarding. In another initiative, in response to fuel poverty and the cost-of-living crisis the group has arranged provision of free slow cookers/heated fire-retardant blankets to people living with these issues. Working as a system we will be holding a Gloucestershire Hoarding Awareness Day in April with the Fire service, housing association, Hoarding UK, Environmental Health etc to share presentations, answer questions and talk about our multi-agency approach.


PREVENT

We recognise the importance of Adult Social Care contributing to work taken to safeguard vulnerable people at risk of radicalisation. Our teams support the multi-agency PREVENT agenda in Gloucestershire.


Self-neglect

We have a focus on self-neglect as part of our strategic plan and have held a number of professional development opportunities for staff.  We have a best practice guidance to support staff.  We are planning to introduce a Multi-Agency Risk Management (MARM) framework this year, as we have identified that there is a growing number of individuals who do not meet the criteria for a Section 42 Enquiry, however, are at high risk of serious harm.  This will be co-ordinated by a dedicated post within the Safeguarding Adults team.


[i] Gloucestershire Safeguarding Adults Board, Published Safeguarding Adults Reviews, https://www.gloucestershire.gov.uk/gsab/safeguarding-adults-board/safeguarding-adults-reviews/

Last reviewed: